Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Secondary naso-palato-alveolar clefts exhibit considerable three-dimensional anatomical variations, which may complicate preoperative assessment and surgical planning.This study evaluated the morphological characteristics of these clefts using three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT).Materials and methods: This retrospective observational study included patients with secondary nasopalato-alveolar clefts who underwent preoperative 3DCT between January 2019 and December 2024.Demographic and clinical records were reviewed, and cleft volume, anteroposterior length, transverse width, and vertical height were assessed.Adjacent tooth/root involvement and nasal floor discontinuity were recorded.Comparisons between unilateral and bilateral clefts accounted for within-patient clustering by using mixed-effects models.Measurement reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Cohen's kappa.Results: Ninety-five patients (mean age, 11.8 ± 3.4 years) contributed 112 cleft observations, comprising 78 unilateral and 34 bilateral clefts.The overall mean cleft volume was 1.82 ± 0.71 cm³.Bilateral clefts demonstrated a greater mean volume than unilateral clefts (2.30 ± 0.82 vs. 1.61 ± 0.56 cm³; mean difference, 0.69 cm³; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.91).Bilateral clefts also exhibited greater anteroposterior length (18.90 ± 5.40 vs. 15.30± 4.10 mm; mean difference, 3.60 mm; p = 0.001; d = 0.76), transverse width (8.50 ± 2.60 vs. 6.50 ± 1.90 mm; mean difference, 2.00 mm; p < 0.001; d = 0.86), and vertical height (15.00 ± 4.30 vs. 13.00 ± 3.60 mm; mean difference, 2.00 mm; p = 0.023; d = 0.51).Adjacent tooth/root involvement and nasal-floor discontinuity were more frequent in bilateral clefts, with odds ratios of 3.46 (95% CI, 1.40-8.55;p = 0.007) and 6.42 (95% CI, 2.52-16.36;p < 0.001), respectively.Cleft volume was positively associated with anteroposterior length (ρ = 0.72), transverse width (ρ = 0.65), and vertical height (ρ = 0.56; all p < 0.001).Measurement reproducibility was excellent, with an ICC of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-0.97)for cleft volume.Conclusion: 3DCT demonstrated substantial variation in secondary naso-palato-alveolar cleft morphology.Bilateral clefts showed greater anatomical involvement, whereas cleft volume was consistently related to the linear dimensions.Standardized three-dimensional assessment may provide useful anatomical information for individualized preoperative evaluation and surgical planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: