Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article is devoted to the consideration of post-punitive restrictions are imposed on subject to administrative liability. It is noted that these consequences do not receive sufficient attention in science of administrative law. When describing administrative liability as one of its characteristics the presence of post-punitive restrictions is usually not single out but if they do, they don’t explain their legal nature. Post-punitive restrictions are administrative and preventive measures by their legal nature which are designed to minimize the risks of unlawful behavior of persons were held to administrative liability. It is important to distinguish between post-punitive restrictions and quasi-administrative punishments with which they have a certain external similarity. Despite the similarity they have a different legal nature. Post-punitive legal restrictions have negative impacts on the reputation of person was held to administrative liability, lead to a restriction of his rights. Their existence is independent characteristic feature of administrative liability as type of legal liability. In The Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation should include the article containing blanket norm about that post-punitive legal restrictions may be established only federal law. The establishment of post-punitive restrictions by subordinate regulatory legal acts is unacceptable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aleksey A. Grishkovets (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: