Objective: To describe mid-medial crus triangular excision for excessive columellar show and evaluate patient satisfaction and Blinded Expert-rated photographic improvement at 1 year.Methods: This retrospective case series included 47 adults who underwent primary closed rhinoplasty with bilateral mid-medial crus triangular excision. We categorized preoperative alar-columellar morphology separately for each side using the Gunter classification. Bilateral alar rim grafts were used in nine patients. We assessed outcomes using preoperative and 1-year postoperative Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) scores on a 0–100 scale and independent right- and left-sided photographic ratings by two Blinded Experts using a study-specific 5-point improvement scale.Results: The mean age was 30.49 ± 7.22 years, and 33 patients (70.2%) were women. Thirty-eight patients (80.9%) had type I and nine (19.1%) had type III morphology bilaterally. The mean ROE score increased from 35.99 ± 9.88 to 84.04 ± 7.54, with a mean increase of 48.05 ± 13.84 points (p < 0.001). Both Blinded Experts assigned scores of 4 or 5 to every assessed side. The proportion of score-5 ratings ranged from 80.9% to 85.1% across the four Blinded Expert-by-side assessments.Conclusion: The surgical approach was associated with increased patient satisfaction and favorable Blinded Expert assessments of columellar appearance at 1 year. Comparative studies with calibrated measurements are needed to establish the specific contribution of triangular excision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yorgun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: