Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The relevance of the research topic is due to the growing number of sports disputes and the formation of new approaches to their resolution. In the context of sanctions pressure and the revision of international sports ties, issues of interaction between national and international judicial authorities are becoming particularly acute. This article examines the issues of differentiation of competence in the consideration of sports disputes between state courts, national (NCCA) and international arbitration (CAS). The analysis of problematic aspects of national legislation has been carried out, the role of the NCSA in the system of current legal regulation has been determined, and the specifics of the consideration of sports disputes have been identified. Based on the analysis, ways to improve law enforcement practice and mechanisms for resolving jurisdictional conflicts aimed at ensuring effective protection of the rights of sports entities are proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. V. Afanasyev (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: