Background Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) provides a semi-quantitative estimate of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) burden as relative light units/cutoff (RLU/CO), and HPV genotyping may add value to triage assessment. We evaluated the association of RLU/CO with cervical lesion severity and explored whether genotype information improves diagnostic performance in HPV-positive Indian women. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in two sequential phases. In the initial phase, 217 consecutive HPV-positive women underwent HC2 HPV DNA testing, colposcopy-guided biopsy, and histopathological assessment. In a subsequent phase, an additional group of 111 HPV-positive women underwent the same clinical and histopathological assessment and also provided specimens for HPV genotyping. The genotype-enriched group was analysed separately for genotype distribution, co-infection patterns, and exploratory genotype-integrated prediction models. Age, Histopathology, and viral load (HC2 RLU/CO) were analysed in the full cohort. The genotyped subset was additionally evaluated for HPV genotype distribution and genotype-integrated ROC models. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis testing with Holm-adjusted Dunn's post-hoc comparisons, and ROC analyses with 95% confidence intervals and paired DeLong comparisons were performed. Results RLU/CO values differed across study-specific histopathological severity categories, with higher median values in LSIL, HSIL, and invasive cervical cancer than in normal histology and chronic cervicitis. In the cohort of 328 women, RLU/CO discriminated HSIL or invasive cervical cancer (severity score ≥3) with an AUC of 0.798 (95% CI, 0.726–0.868). A study-derived Youden-index cutoff of 12.08 RLU/CO yielded a sensitivity of 81.1% (95% CI, 69.5%–90.9%) and specificity of 73.1% (95% CI, 68.0%–78.0%). Among 111 genotyped participants, HPV16 was the most frequently detected genotype, and multiple-genotype infections occurred in 64 participants (57.7%). In the genotyped subgroup, comparative ROC analysis for HSIL or invasive cervical cancer showed AUCs of 0.659 for RLU/CO alone, 0.608 for RLU/CO plus HPV16/18, and 0.461 for RLU/CO plus other high-risk HPV. Neither genotype-integrated model improved discrimination compared with RLU/CO alone; these exploratory estimates require validation in larger independent cohorts. Conclusion HC2 RLU/CO showed potential for identifying HSIL or invasive cervical cancer. The study-derived cutoff requires validation in independent populations. Genotype-integrated models showed variable performance in the small subgroup. The HPV16/18 model was comparable to RLU/CO alone, but findings were exploratory. Larger prospective studies are needed before clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: