Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) offers a strategic pathway toward sustainable urban construction. The Node–Place model, a classic analytical framework in TOD typology, provides the basis for assessing TOD performance. This study introduces a vitality dimension to extend the model, constructing a Node–Place–Vitality (NPV) model. We apply the NPV model to the Hangzhou rail transit system, evaluating TOD performance using indicators across three dimensions: node, place, and vitality. Then we classify the station types by K-means++ clustering. The results show that: (1) TOD development exhibits marked spatial inequality, with higher levels in central urban areas and along trunk lines; (2) the NPV model reveals synergies and imbalances among transport, land use, and vitality; (3) rail transit stations can be categorised into five distinct types, each with differentiated functional orientations. The NPV model provides a more integrated and dynamic framework for TOD assessment, supporting differentiated planning strategies and promoting sustainable urban development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: