Introduction Volcanic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) is widely used to infer deep magmatic degassing, but the flux measured at the surface is filtered by hydrothermal storage, chemical reactions, pathway permeability, and environmental forcing. Methods In this study, a low-dimensional geochemical transfer theory links dissolved magmatic carbon, mobile exsolved CO2, hydrothermal pressure, aqueous and mineral carbon storage, and connected-fracture permeability. Local linearization quantifies the frequency-dependent gain and delay of a mobile-gas perturbation transmitted to the surface, together with barometric admittance. A reduced nonlinear realization provides synthetic checks of direct, buffered, delayed, and pathway-controlled responses; frequency-specific recovery, parameter-sensitivity, and time-step analyses show how these responses depend on storage and pathway time scales. A published-data test using 30 Solfatara surveys evaluates whether the sampled flux distributions can be explained using a single multiplicative amplitude factor. Results The direct-proxy interpretation is recovered only when hydrothermal retention is weak, pathway conductance is approximately stationary, and atmospheric forcing is small. Both ordinary least-squares and robust Theil–Sen estimates show upper-quantile scaling shallower than the unit slope required by that null model (for Q 95 , slopes of 0.28 and 0.46, with Theil–Sen 95% interval 0.10–0.88). Discussion The result indicates non-uniform scaling of the sampled flux distribution, consistent with changes in spatial distribution and pathway contribution in addition to bulk amplitude. The theory therefore converts a qualitative source-versus-pathway ambiguity into explicit transfer regimes, local observation degeneracies, and measurement requirements within one physically interpretable geochemical structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sebastiano Ettore Spoto (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: