Fast and accurate composition-to-property prediction is critical for accelerating the discovery of multicomponent bio-adhesive hydrogels, yet current surrogate models are predominantly evaluated under random data splits that do not reflect the distribution shift encountered in real-world iterative screening. Moreover, existing deep learning approaches for small-sample formulation data offer little systematic guidance on architecture design and often depend on laboriously engineered interaction features. This study introduces Simplex-Inspired Multimodal Predictive Learning Encoder with X-modal Fusion (SIMPLEX), a dual-modality deep encoder purpose-built for composition-driven property estimation. Its gated multimodal fusion component autonomously learns inter-component interactions without hand-crafted quadratic terms. We establish a fully reproducible benchmark covering eight models with unified hyper-parameter tuning and statistical protocols. Evaluated on 316 internal hydrogel formulations under grouped cross-validation, SIMPLEX achieves first-tier predictive performance, competitive with the strongest classical baselines. On 25 prospectively collected formulations acquired from a Bayesian-optimized closed-loop campaign, a setting that introduces a deliberate distribution shift toward high-performance compositions, SIMPLEX delivers the highest coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.6712 ) for adhesion-strength prediction, meeting the demand for precise quantitative estimation in iterative candidate screening. Feature dissection reveals that the native compositional representation already captures the dominant composition–property relationships, and component-wise ablation pinpoints gated multimodal fusion as the principal performance driver. This study delivers a capable deep encoder together with a rigorous, transparent evaluation paradigm for formulation-driven machine learning, providing immediately reusable baselines and design principles for the community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: