Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Blood-based multi-cancer detection has the potential to complement existing organ-specific screening by enabling simultaneous detection of tumour-associated signals across multiple malignancies. This study aimed to clinically validate an ultradeep targeted cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing assay for cancer detection across 19 cancer types and clinical stages. Methods: This retrospective case-control study analysed 4,662 archived plasma samples collected between 2022 and 2025, comprising 2,667 participants with histologically confirmed, treatment-naïve malignancies and 1,995 cancer-free controls. cfDNA was ana-lysed using a custom hybridisation-capture next-generation sequencing panel, with unique molecular identifiers and ultradeep sequencing. Diagnostic performance was assessed across various cancer type and clinical stage. Results: Overall sensitivity was 88.6% (95% CI, 87.4-89.8%) and specificity was 99.2% (95% CI, 98.8-99.5%), with an overall accuracy of 93.2% (95% CI, 92.4-93.9%). Sensitivity exceeded 80% in 15 of 19 cancer types and was 90% or greater in 10 of 19 cancer types. Pan-cancer sensitivity was 74.3% (450/606; 95% CI, 70.6-77.6%) in stage I, 85.4% (573/671; 82.5-87.9%) in stage II, 96.2% (608/632; 94.4-97.4%) in stage III, and 98.7% (665/674; 97.5-99.3%) in stage IV. The test demonstrated particularly strong performance for the early detection of breast, colorectal, gastric, liver, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers, with combined stage I–II sensitivity exceeding 80% for these tumour types. This early-stage sensitivity was substantially higher than that reported for the corresponding conventional serum tumour markers. Conclusions: Ultradeep targeted cfDNA sequencing demonstrated broad multi-cancer detection across diverse tumour types, with substantial sensitivity in stages I-II disease. These findings support further prospective validation of this approach in intended-use screening populations and evaluation of its potential integration with existing cancer detection pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: