Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: To determine whether quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) plaque characteristics associated with fractional flow reserve (FFR)-defined ischemia vary among coronary arteries and whether they improve prediction when added to conventional clinical and stenosis information. Methods: This retrospective study included 204 patients and 289 vessels (161 left anterior descending [LAD], 55 left circumflex [LCX], and 73 right coronary artery [RCA] vessels) evaluated by CCTA and invasive FFR. Plaque characteristics were quantified using semi-automated software. Predictors were selected separately by vessel using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) for LAD and RCA and Boruta-XGBoost for LCX. Model evaluation incorporated five-fold cross-validation and bootstrap resampling. Incremental performance was assessed by adding selected plaque features to Model 1, which comprised clinical variables and severe stenosis (≥70%). Results: FFR-defined ischemia (FFR ≤ 0.80) was identified in 90 LAD, 24 LCX, and 37 RCA vessels. Ischemic vessels had longer lesions, smaller minimum luminal area, greater stenosis, and higher plaque burden. Vessel-specific plaque models yielded areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.755 (95% CI: 0.682–0.826), 0.789 (95% CI: 0.656–0.905), and 0.775 (95% CI: 0.661–0.877) for LAD, LCX, and RCA, respectively. In a separate incremental analysis, compared with Model 1, Model 2 improved AUC in LAD (0.613 to 0.755; net reclassification improvement (NRI) = 0.736; integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) = 0.163) and RCA (0.489 to 0.767; NRI = 0.955; IDI = 0.276), with smaller gains in LCX (0.617 to 0.754; NRI = 0.651; IDI = 0.169). Conclusions: Quantitative CCTA plaque characteristics showed potentially vessel-dependent associations with FFR-defined ischemia. Incorporating selected plaque features into clinical and stenosis-based models improved discrimination in the LAD and RCA. These exploratory findings require validation in larger, independent cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: