With the rapid growth of machine learning (ML) applications in landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM), many studies have relied on large and diverse datasets to improve predictive performance. However, in data-scarce regions, model transferability becomes challenging, and not all input variables contribute meaningful information to landslide prediction, leading to the well-known problem of “garbage in, garbage out”. Therefore, careful selection of physically meaningful predictors is essential. In this study, we develop a Random Forest–based framework for landslide mapping using topographic and climatic factors only as inputs. Notably, the model incorporates effective rainfall (ER), derived from a process-based hydrological model, and a recently proposed topographic metric, topographic source density (D_ts), that were not used in previous LSM studies. Results demonstrate that incorporating these predictors substantially improves model performance, achieving a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.972. Overall, the findings suggest that a physically meaningful machine learning approach can reliably predict regional landslide susceptibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raina et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: