Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Literature abounds on the smallpox epidemics of 1713, 1755 and 1767 at the Cape, and how the epidemics destroyed the Khoisan way of life. Historians agree that these epidemics decimated most of the Khoisan clans and further eroded their social, economic and political strength, and in the process, exposed them to the naked sky of the ruthless marauding forces of colonialism whose sole intent was to feed their insatiable appetite for arable land and mineralogical riches. Thus, the available orthodox scholarly accounts do not adequately explain the origin of the smallpox virus that precipitated irreparable havoc in the Khoisan communities. The literature treats the spread of the virus as an accident. Therefore, using the available primary and secondary sources and a qualitative research approach, this article explores the 1713, 1755 and 1767 smallpox epidemics at the Cape, with a specific focus on the origins, effects, as well as the indigenous Khoisan clans’ perception of the epidemics. It argues that the introduction of smallpox at the Cape by the Dutch waxed and waned the Khoisan resistance to the Dutch invaders and, therefore, aided the process of colonialism. Drawing on the example of the British distribution of smallpox-contaminated blankets and a handkerchief to Native Americans in 1763, the article concludes that there is a possibility that the smallpox-infected blanket which arrived at the Cape on 14 February 1713 may have served a similar purpose- to weaken the Khoisan population, thereby facilitating colonial expansion and the occupation of their territories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butholezwe Mtombeni (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: