The recent introduction of automated complimentary upgrades reflects the emerging role of artificial intelligence (AI) in making symbolically meaningful decisions in tourism. We explore consumers’ responses using a thematic analysis of online comments and open-ended survey responses, followed by a quantitative survey to validate findings. Paradoxically, the qualitative analysis reveals that both unbiased decisions and personalization are valued. The quantitative study further shows that lay beliefs about AI are associated with preferences, through procedural and interactional fairness. Only procedural fairness fully mediates the lay beliefs’ association with intention to negotiate out of dissatisfying upgrade decisions. Moreover, desire to be treated as a unique customer weakens the lay beliefs’ association with interactional fairness and the indirect association with preferences. We contribute by revealing how consumers respond when automated agents make symbolically meaningful decisions in the automated preferential treatment context. Firms should prioritize the procedural legitimacy and symbolic framing of automated decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: