Chloride-induced corrosion of steel reinforcement is a major durability concern for reinforced concrete infrastructure exposed to deicing salts and other chloride-bearing environments. The use of corrosion-resistant reinforcing bars provides a potential means of extending structural service life; however, comparative information on the performance of different reinforcement systems under identical exposure conditions remains important for material selection. In this study, bare, quenched and tempered, Duplex 2304 stainless steel, epoxy-coated, galvanized, and ChromX-9100 reinforcing bars were evaluated in the as-received condition using the Rapid Macrocell test described in ASTM A955. Corrosion rate, cumulative corrosion loss, and anode corrosion potential were monitored during the 15-week testing period. The Duplex 2304 stainless steel reinforcing bars exhibited the highest resistance to chloride-induced corrosion, with an overall average corrosion loss of approximately 0.25% of that of the bare reinforcing bars. The epoxy-coated, galvanized, and ChromX-9100 reinforcing bars exhibited overall average corrosion losses of approximately 25%, 33%, and 40% of that of the bare bars, respectively. In contrast, the quenched and tempered reinforcing bars exhibited an overall average corrosion loss approximately 25% greater than that of the bare reinforcement. These findings provide a direct comparative assessment of commonly available reinforcement systems and can assist in evaluating reinforcement options for concrete structures exposed to aggressive chloride environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghafoori et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: