Introduction: Automated insulin delivery is recommended for youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We aimed to increase the percentage of youth with T1D (diagnosed > 1 y) in 1 pediatric health system actively using an insulin pump from 56% to 65% within 18 months while reducing disparities based on race/ethnicity and insurance type. Methods: Following the Model for Improvement, local stakeholders organized this quality improvement project, identified a theory of change, and tested change ideas using the plan-do-study-act framework. We evaluated the primary outcome with a statistical process control chart, secondary outcomes with run charts, and other measures with descriptive statistics. Results: Between February 2024 and August 2025, insulin pump use increased from 56% to 65%, but disparities by race/ethnicity and insurance type persisted. Time from insulin pump education to initiation decreased by 19.8 days for patients who attended a group technology class. Non-face-to-face encounter volume decreased from 938 to 862 encounters per month, and diabetes-associated ketoacidosis events remained stable at 2% per month. Conclusions: This initiative increased insulin pump use among both reference and minoritized groups of youth with T1D at a single institution and improved the efficiency of the insulin pump initiation process without a measurable increase in workload or diabetes-associated ketoacidosis events. Although increased pump adoption among both groups is encouraging, continued advocacy at the individual and policy levels is needed to achieve optimal pump use and reduce disparities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vidmar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: