Neoclassical tearing modes (NTM) and tearing modes (TM) pose significant risks to long-pulse operation in the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak. Machine learning approaches promise fast precursor recognition, but fixed-window classifiers can produce deceptively high validation scores that do not translate into practical online alarm performance. In this work, we develop a reproducible, multi-diagnostic framework with rolling-aware training using hard negative examples from entire non-disruptive discharges, teaching the model what safe operation actually looks like. Using 55 discharges (35 with NTM/TM onset) and 826 hand-crafted features, combining generic channel statistics with physics-informed cross-diagnostic coupling measures, a LightGBM classifier achieved grouped 5-fold cross-validation ROC-AUC of 0.9817 (near-perfect), but fails in rolling simulation with 1.0 false alarms per negative shot. After rolling-aware training, the false-alarm rate drops to 0.10 per negative shot at 0.857 sensitivity (catching 85.7% of true events), with a median warning lead time of 1445 ms—about 1.5 s, valuable for mitigation. Generalisation is confirmed by out-of-fold AUC of 0.858 ± 0.0635 and temporal-block holdout AUC of 0.7986. SHAP interpretation based on the 1 kHz and 10 kHz sampling rates using a rolling window shows that low-frequency features of Mirnov probe signals dominate the top importance ranks, while ECE band power and channel-wise statistical features provide complementary information. These results establish a realistic, interpretable baseline for EAST NTM/TM warning and demonstrate that rolling-aware hard-negative training is essential to bridge the gap between offline accuracy and online reliability in fusion field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Long et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: