LGBTQ+ people with intellectual disabilities remain largely overlooked in research and practice, reinforcing stigma, restrictive norms, and experiences of non-recognition that affect well-being, autonomy, and relationships. This study examines how adults describe their identities, relationships, and daily challenges, focusing on inclusion, exclusion, and strategies used to navigate them. Grounded in a critical, intersectional disability perspective, this study draws on narrative interviews with ten adults living in the province of Québec, Canada. Using Medico’s adaptation of Honneth’s recognition theory, analyses explored recognition and misrecognition across subjective, relational, community, and legal dimensions. Participants described early identity questioning, rejection of fixed labels, and moments of affirmation when self-understanding aligned with expression. While supportive relationships and safe spaces fostered recognition, participants also reported stigma, institutional barriers, limited relational opportunities, and exposure to violence. Findings underscore recognition’s centrality and the need for inclusive, accessible, dignity‑based practices and services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milot et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: