Background/Objectives: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a genetically heterogeneous plasma cell malignancy characterized by progressive genomic instability and therapeutic resistance. Melphalan remains a cornerstone of MM treatment, particularly as high-dose conditioning before autologous stem cell transplantation; however, acquired resistance significantly limits its efficacy. This study aimed to identify molecular determinants of melphalan responsiveness by evaluating redox status and DNA damage response (DDR)-associated parameters in human MM cell line models. Methods: Melphalan-sensitive (RPMI-8226, U266) and melphalan-resistant (LR5, LR6) human MM cell lines were comparatively analyzed for baseline oxidative stress, accumulation of abasic sites, DNA damage, chromatin organization, and apoptotic sensitivity following melphalan exposure. UVC-induced DNA damage resolution and the kinetics of melphalan-induced γH2AX foci removal were also assessed. Results: Melphalan-sensitive cell lines exhibited significantly higher baseline DNA damage, γH2AX foci, abasic sites, and oxidative stress compared with resistant counterparts. In contrast, melphalan-resistant cells demonstrated more efficient resolution of UVC-induced DNA damage, faster removal of melphalan-induced γH2AX foci, more accessible chromatin, and markedly reduced apoptotic sensitivity following melphalan treatment. Multivariate statistical analyses identified distinct DDR-related molecular signatures associated with melphalan-sensitive and melphalan-resistant phenotypes. Conclusions: Melphalan resistance in MM is associated with coordinated alterations in redox status, DNA damage dynamics, chromatin organization, and apoptotic sensitivity. These findings suggest that DDR-associated parameters may contribute to the molecular characterization of melphalan responsiveness and provide a framework for understanding resistance-associated phenotypes. Further functional studies are required to establish whether these alterations directly mediate melphalan resistance and represent actionable therapeutic targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malamos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: