Capturing carbon dioxide at a climate-relevant scale is an energy supply problem as much as a separation problem. We developed a linked scenario model that follows capture mix, heat supply, and carbon fate through one balance of heat, electricity, generation, storage, land, and retained carbon. An illustrative 10 Gt CO2/year portfolio with 55% flue-gas capture, 25% already separated CO2, and 20% direct air capture (DAC) needs 30.25 EJ/year of process heat and 10.06 EJ/year of direct electricity. On an annual energy basis, dedicated wind and solar supply requires 5.37 TW of nameplate capacity with electric boilers, and 2.64 TW with heat pumps at a coefficient of performance of 3. Losing the already separated streams and drawing heat from a heat-pump source at 20 °C raises the requirement to 4.12 TW. Complete electrochemical DAC must use less than 3.47 GJ/t of precompression electricity to beat thermal DAC with heat pumps, and diverting 1 Gt/year of DAC CO2 to methanol more than doubles portfolio electricity while halving the atmospheric CO2 reaching geological storage. The results are scenario-dependent and identify heat integration, source availability, and carbon fate as screening criteria for process development and deployment planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fayyaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: