This study examined the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Work Needs Satisfaction Scale and investigated differences in work-related need satisfaction across gender and race/color groups, informed by an intersectional perspective. Participants were 1521 Brazilian adults (67.2% women; mean age = 35.09 years), recruited across three independent waves of data collection. Confirmatory factor analyses, multi-group invariance tests, and comparisons across gender and race/color groups were conducted. The five-factor structure, survival, social contribution, competence, relatedness, and autonomy showed adequate fit (CFI = .94; RMSEA = .07) and high internal consistency (α = .79–.92; ω = .83–.94). Invariance analyses indicated metric and scalar equivalence across gender and race/color based on practical fit-index criteria. Group comparisons revealed a significant main effect of race/color, with Black participants reporting lower levels of satisfaction in survival, social contribution, competence, and autonomy than White participants; the gender-by-race/color interaction was not significant. These findings indicate that, although the scale’s structure remains psychometrically stable, work-related need satisfaction is unequally distributed, reflecting persistent structural inequalities in the Brazilian labor market. The study extends the application of the Psychology of Working Theory within a Brazilian context situated in the Global South and reinforces the importance of reliable measures for research and promoting social justice and equity in the workplace.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrade et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: