Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Aim: The clinical efficacy of sorafenib against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is severely limited by limited efficacy and off-target toxicity. Overexpression of oncogenic miR-21 has been identified as a key driver of these limitations, as it downregulates the tumor suppressors PTEN and PDCD4, thereby aberrantly activating both the PI3K/Akt and STAT3 signaling pathways. To address the limitations of conventional sorafenib therapy, we aimed to construct a smart nanocarrier capable of simultaneously delivering sorafenib (SF) and anti-miR-21 specifically to HCC cells. Materials and Methods: We designed a core-shell nanoparticle consisting of a PAMAM dendrimer/anti-miR-21 polyplex core and a hyaluronic acid-sorafenib conjugate shell. This architecture enables CD44-mediated active targeting and pH-responsive drug release in the acidic tumor microenvironment. The antitumor activity of the co-delivery system was evaluated in vitro using HepG2 cells, with assessments of cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and the underlying signaling pathways. Results: The prepared nanoparticle exhibited potent anti-proliferative, anti-migratory, and pro-apoptotic effects in HepG2 cells. Mechanistic studies revealed that these benefits were associated with the reduced phosphorylation of key proteins in both the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and STAT3 cascades, effectively counteracting the therapy limitations that are normally fueled by miR-21 overexpression. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that CD44-guided co-delivery of sorafenib and anti-miR-21 provides a promising nanotherapeutic strategy to counteract therapy limitations through coordinated blockade of two major oncogenic pathways in HCC cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
XU et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: