Nanoscale film thickness metrology suffers from inconsistent results across instruments operating on different physical principles, which undermines measurement reliability and traceability. For single-wavelength ellipsometry in particular, inherent coupling between film thickness and refractive index causes inversion ambiguity, hindering rigorous metrological comparison with metrological atomic force microscopy (AFM). To address this, we propose a stepped SiO2 thin film fabricated by atomic layer deposition and wet etching as a transfer standard for cross-method comparison. The metrological AFM measures step height traceable to the SI meter definition via three-axis laser interferometry, while the ellipsometer derives thickness from ellipsometric parameters (Ψ, Δ) traceable to an iodine-stabilized He-Ne laser. A multi-sample global fitting strategy is adopted to resolve the underdetermined inversion problem. For three samples of ~105 nm, ~492 nm and ~955 nm, the two methods show relative deviations below 0.5%, with a normalized deviation EN of 0.26 for the 955 nm sample, well below the acceptance threshold of 1. Results confirm the stepped film as an effective transfer standard, providing a practical framework for value unification in nanoscale film thickness metrology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: