Objective: To examine whether sarcopenia at rehabilitation admission is associated with 3-month recovery of balance, trunk control, and gait in subacute stroke patients with impaired balance.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 49 subacute stroke patients who received inpatient rehabilitation for at least 3 months. Participants were classified at admission into sarcopenia group (SG, n=18) and non-sarcopenia group (NSG, n=31) according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria, using unaffected-side grip strength and skeletal muscle index. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was the principal outcome, with the Korean- Trunk Impairment Scale (K-TIS), Motricity Index of Lower Extremity (MI-LE), and Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) as secondary outcomes. Changes were compared by analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline, and threshold-based proportions by Fisher’s exact test.Results: Baseline outcome scores were comparable except for a lower FAC in the SG (p=0.02). After 3 months, the NSG showed greater improvements in all four outcomes, with significant baseline-adjusted differences after Bonferroni correction for BBS (5.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.98 to 9.76), K-TIS (3.68; 95% CI, 1.52 to 5.83), and MI-LE (8.75; 95% CI, 4.65 to 12.85), persisting under stepwise covariate adjustment. The ordinal FAC was compared categorically: fewer SG patients improved by ≥1 category (22.2% vs. 58.1%, p=0.02).Conclusion: Sarcopenia assessed at rehabilitation admission was associated with smaller 3-month gains in trunk control, balance, lower extremity muscle strength, and gait in this selected cohort of subacute stroke inpatients. Prospective studies with pre-stroke or hyperacute muscle assessment are needed to determine whether premorbid sarcopenia independently predicts recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: