This study proposes a solar-driven methane pyrolysis system in which a particle-based concentrating solar power (CSP) plant supplies heat directly to an array of molten-salt (MnCl 2 –KCl) bubble-column reactors through the reactor wall, without an intermediate heat-transfer fluid or electric heating step. An hourly-resolved CSP model over a full year, comprising a heliostat field, a free-falling particle receiver, and two-bin thermal energy storage, is coupled to a reactor model that includes reaction kinetics, bubble hydrodynamics, particle-to-salt heat transfer, and equipment sizing. The integrated plant is assessed through a techno-economic analysis for a site in Daggett, California. At the baseline design (hot and cold particle temperatures of 1100 and 950 °C, 14 h of storage), the bulk salt temperature is 936 °C, the plant reaches a capacity factor of 69% and a single-pass methane conversion of 45%, and it produces about 6700 t/yr of hydrogen at a levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH 2 ) of $3.87/kg without carbon credit and $3.52/kg with credit for the co-produced carbon. Raising the reactor temperature increases the cost of solar heat but lowers LCOH 2 through faster kinetics and fewer reactor modules, so the CSP and reactor subsystems must be designed jointly. Natural gas accounts for about 54% of LCOH 2 , and the particle-to-wall heat transfer coefficient is the most influential design parameter. At an assumed hydrogen price of $4/kg, the project has a positive 30-year net present value of $53 M with the carbon credit and without Section 45 V or LCFS policy support. At a gas price of $6/GJ and a hot-particle temperature of 1200 °C (bulk salt temperature of 1021 °C), approaching the conditions of earlier studies, LCOH 2 falls to $1.9–2.3/kg depending on the carbon credit. The configuration is a conceptual design: experimental validation of the particle-to-wall heat transfer, corrosion, creep, thermal cycling, abrasion, and liner compatibility in molten chloride is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yousef et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: