Clan networks may ease entrepreneurial frictions but may create localized advantages that shape market selection. This paper examines how clan networks are associated with firm growth and entry-exit dynamics in China. Combining prefecture-level data for 267 cities from 2000 to 2017 with genealogy records and firm-level data from the Annual Survey of Industrial Firms, we distinguish an aggregate city-level proxy for market activity from city-surname-year measures of firm entry and exit. Clan networks are positively associated with city-level firm growth. The entry-exit evidence is more selective: the relatively more stable pattern is lower observed exit among high-efficiency same-surname firms, while the baseline same-surname entry estimate is positive but less robust across checks. Evidence for different-surname groups is weaker and concentrated mainly on entry. The findings suggest that kinship-based informal institutions are associated with selective entry-exit patterns that vary across institutional settings, rather than with a uniform expansion of business dynamism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: