This study develops an experimentally supported framework for assessing façade-applied photovoltaic (PV) systems as a strategy for reducing grid-electricity demand and evaluating building energy performance in a Mediterranean educational building. The Faculty of Engineering, Damanhour University, Egypt, is considered as the sole case study. The methodology integrates localized field electrical testing, a weather-adjusted July–August electrical time series, façade specific annual solar-radiation screening, controlled DesignBuilder/EnergyPlus simulations, and a transparent module-cost economic assessment. A field test conducted on 2 July 2026 recorded a mean current of 2.72 A and peak current of 3.57 A, corresponding to mean and peak power outputs of 41.42 and 54.33 W for the conventional PV test. A separate two-point BIPV test recorded a mean current of 8.05 A and mean power of 89.79 W. The weather-adjusted dataset covers 1 July–12 August 2026 at 30-minute intervals for JSM-195SP and JS-190W-Special modules installed at 90° and 30°. Annual solar-radiation screening identified Elevation 1 as the most favorable vertical façade, receiving 1,141.2 kWh/m²·year, while the roof received 1,726.8 kWh/m²·year. The annual building assessment uses 8,760-hour DesignBuilder/EnergyPlus simulations with a common modeled PV façade allocation of 1,123.20 m². A baseline and four PV scenarios were evaluated. JSM-195SP at 30° generated 229,119.60 kWh/year and reduced net grid electricity consumption by 217,663.62 kWh/year (18.93%), reducing Net EUI to 200.70 kWh/m²·year and simulated district cooling by 7.41%. Based on an electricity tariff of 1.95 EGP/kWh and module prices of 6,000 EGP/panel for JSM-195SP and 12,000 EGP/panel for JS-190W-Special, simple module-cost payback periods were 13.03, 100.55, 6.20, and 46.24 years for JSM-195SP at 90°, JS-190W-Special at 90°, JSM-195SP at 30°, and JS-190W-Special at 30°, respectively. Using the 2026 EIB Egypt intermittent-generation factor of 0.498 kgCO₂/kWh, annual avoided operational emissions were estimated at 51.63, 32.20, 108.40, and 70.02 tCO₂/year, respectively. These represent emission reductions and potential carbon-credit quantities subject to applicable certification and additionality requirements. The study does not claim calibrated annual utility validation or whole-building net-zero status; rather, it establishes a reproducible evidence chain linking measured electrical behavior, façade selection, annual simulation, environmental assessment, and investment screening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elkordy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: