Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This essay explores problems of consistency among commonsense beliefs about the comparative moral status of animals, fetuses, and human beings congenitally endowed with cognitive capacities and potential no higher than those of higher animals. The possibility of genetic cognitive enhancement exacerbates some of these problems, but also offers new resources for understanding the basis of our moral status as inviolable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeff McMahan (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: