Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a noncongested transportation network where each user chooses his quickest route, the creation of an additional route between some origin-destination pair clearly cannot result in an increase in travel time to users traveling between that o-d pair. It seems reasonable to assume the same can be said of congested networks. In 1968, D. Braess presented a remarkable example demonstrating this is not the case: a new route can increase travel time for all. The present paper gives, under reasonable assumptions, necessary and sufficient conditions for “Braess' Paradox” to occur in a general transportation network. As a corollary, we obtain that Braess' Paradox is about as likely to occur as not occur.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Willard I. Zangwill (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: