Key result
Anodal tDCS increases parasympathetic modulation during stimulation vs sham, but slows post-stimulation Stroop performance.
Why the study?
Transcranial direct current stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has been investigated to modulate cognitive performance and autonomic regulation in sport, but evidence in Paralympic athletes remains scarce.
Does a single session of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improve cognitive performance and alter cardiac autonomic modulation compared to sham stimulation in male para-canoeing athletes?
RCT (n=8)
Sham-controlled
Randomized crossover
Does a single session of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improve cognitive performance and alter cardiac autonomic modulation compared to sham stimulation in male para-canoeing athletes?
In a pilot crossover trial of male para-canoeing athletes, acute anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improved Stroop cognitive accuracy and induced a sympathetic shift in heart rate variability compared to sham stimulation.
May improve cognitive accuracy in paracanoe athletes; extends tDCS autonomic data but remains hypothesis-generating pending larger trials.
Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has been investigated as a non-invasive strategy to modulate cognitive performance and autonomic regulation in sport, but evidence in Paralympic athletes remains scarce. This study evaluated the acute effects of anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on cognitive performance and cardiovascular autonomic modulation in para-canoeing athletes. Methods This pilot, randomized, sham-controlled, single-blind, within-subject crossover trial included eight male para-canoeing athletes (35.4 ± 5.4 years). In randomized order, separated by a seven-day washout, each participant received one session of anodal tDCS (anode at F3, cathode at Fp2; 2 mA; 20 minutes) and one sham session. Cognitive performance was assessed with the Stroop Test (eight athletes) and cardiac autonomic modulation with heart rate variability indices (five athletes with adequate signal quality). Differences between conditions and time points were estimated with the percentile bootstrap (10,000 resamples; 95% confidence intervals), with simulation-based power projection for larger samples. Results In the anodal condition, correct responses on the color Stroop increased from pre- to post-intervention (mean pre-minus-post difference − 7.63; 95% confidence interval − 15.50 to − 1.75). After the intervention, markers of relative sympathetic modulation of heart rate variability (absolute low-frequency power, its natural logarithm, and the ratio of low- to high-frequency power) were higher in the anodal than in the sham condition. In the sham condition, heart rate increased and the R–R interval decreased from pre- to post-intervention. Conclusions In this pilot sample, anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was associated with improved Stroop accuracy and a sympathetic shift in cardiac autonomic modulation, a promising signal that requires confirmation in a larger, independent sample before any applied recommendation. Trial registration: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC), RBR-47g8ts7, registered on 18 May 2026 (retrospectively registered).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vieira et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Paracanoe athletes (functional classes VL2 and VL3) (n=8). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) vs. Sham tDCS was evaluated on Cognitive performance (Stroop test) and heart rate variability (HRV) indices. Anodal tDCS yielded a post-stimulation Stroop colours time of 113.0 ± 12.3 s vs 106.8 ± 17.5 s with sham, and a mean rMSSD change during stimulation of +12.16 ± 20.03 ms vs -7.68 ± 11.91 ms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: