Key result
Valsartan/sacubitril uniquely preserves left ventricular contractility and relaxation over valsartan alone in hypertensive rats.
Why the study?
Valsartan/sacubitril improves outcomes in heart failure, but its effects on cardiac performance in chronic hypertension remain unclear.
Does chronic valsartan/sacubitril treatment improve hemodynamics, cardiac morphology and function, and isolated-heart left ventricular responses compared with valsartan alone, valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide, or vehicle in spontaneously hypertensive rats?
Does chronic valsartan/sacubitril treatment improve hemodynamics, cardiac morphology and function, and isolated-heart left ventricular responses compared with valsartan alone, valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide, or vehicle in spontaneously hypertensive rats?
In spontaneously hypertensive rats, chronic valsartan/sacubitril treatment preserves ex vivo left ventricular contractile and relaxation performance under high coronary flow beyond its blood pressure-lowering effect.
Should not alter hypertension management; hypothesis-generating for neprilysin inhibition effects beyond blood pressure reduction.
Background/Objectives: Valsartan/sacubitril improves outcomes in heart failure, but its effects on cardiac performance in chronic hypertension remain unclear. We investigated the effects of chronic valsartan/sacubitril treatment on hemodynamics, cardiac morphology and function, coronary perfusion pressure, and left ventricular responses in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Methods: Thirty-two male SHR were assigned to Vehicle, Valsartan, Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide, or Valsartan/Sacubitril groups (n = 8) and treated for 12 weeks. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters were assessed at 18 and 30 weeks of age. At 30 weeks, isolated-heart responses to progressive increases in coronary flow and to β-adrenergic stimulation were evaluated using the Langendorff technique. Results: All pharmacological treatments reduced blood pressure versus Vehicle, with no additional reduction from combination therapy compared with Valsartan alone. Echocardiographic parameters showed time-related changes without treatment-specific effects. At the highest coronary flow levels, Valsartan/Sacubitril preserved left ventricular pressure and showed greater dP/dtmax and more negative dP/dtmin values than all other groups. β-Adrenergic responsiveness also differed among groups, particularly at higher agonist doses. Conclusions: In SHR, all pharmacological treatments reduced blood pressure to a similar extent, with no additional reduction when valsartan was combined with hydrochlorothiazide or sacubitril. In the isolated heart, however, only valsartan/sacubitril maintained left ventricular contractile performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Velasco et al. (2026) studied Chronic hypertension (spontaneously hypertensive rats) (n=32). Valsartan/Sacubitril vs. Vehicle, Valsartan alone, or Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide was evaluated on Hemodynamics, echocardiographic parameters, and isolated-heart left ventricular responses (left ventricular pressure, dP/dtmax, dP/dtmin) to coronary flow and beta-adrenergic stimulation. Valsartan/sacubitril for 12 weeks in hypertensive rats reduced blood pressure similarly to valsartan alone, but uniquely preserved isolated-heart left ventricular pressure, dP/dtmax, and dP/dtmin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: