Key result
High-risk PCAT radiomics linked to ~2.6-fold higher MACE risk, outperforming standard FAI models.
Why the study?
The predictive efficacy and risk stratification potential of CCTA-derived pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) radiomics for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) required evaluation.
Does a CCTA-derived pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) radiomics model improve the prediction and risk stratification of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to FAI and clinical models in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=978)
Blinded outcome adjudication
No
Does a CCTA-derived pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) radiomics model improve the prediction and risk stratification of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to FAI and clinical models in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
CCTA-derived pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics significantly outperforms fat attenuation index and clinical models in predicting and stratifying the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (predominantly angina worsening/instability) in patients with suspected CAD.
PCAT radiomics may enhance MACE stratification beyond FAI in CCTA; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
To evaluate the predictive efficacy and risk stratification potential of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) radiomics for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). We retrospectively enrolled patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent CCTA at our hospital between June 2017 and June 2020, with 5-year follow-up for MACE occurrence. Patients were grouped by MACE status. Machine learning was applied to construct and compare three models: PCAT radiomics model, fat attenuation index (FAI) model, and clinical model. Prospective validation was conducted in 578 patients with suspected CAD undergoing CCTA, who were stratified into high- and low-risk groups by the optimal cutoff of the PCAT radiomics model. The predictive and risk stratification performance of all models was assessed. Fourteen PCAT radiomics features (5 first-order and 9 texture features) were finally screened. The PCAT radiomics model showed significantly superior MACE predictive performance over the FAI and clinical models ( P < 0.001). Only the PCAT radiomics model identified significantly higher MACE risk in the high-risk versus low-risk group (HR=2.611, 95% CI: 1.806–3.775, P < 0.001), with progressively reduced MACE-free survival in the high-risk group during follow-up ( P < 0.001). No such significant between-group differences were found in the FAI and clinical models (all P > 0.05). The PCAT radiomics model showed favorable performance for predicting the composite MACE endpoint, which was predominantly driven by worsening stable or unstable angina, and provided better risk stratification than the FAI and clinical models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=978). High-risk CCTA-derived pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) radiomics score (>=0.51) vs. Low-risk PCAT radiomics score (<0.51), fat attenuation index (FAI) model, and clinical model was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including unstable/worsening angina, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization (HR 2.611, 95% CI 1.806-3.775, p=<0.001). High-risk CCTA-derived PCAT radiomics stratification predicted a higher risk of MACE vs low-risk stratification (HR 2.611, 95% CI 1.806-3.775, P<0.001), outperforming FAI and clinical models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: