This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Pregnancy-associated melanoma requires integration of maternal cancer prognosis with treatment, obstetric and fetal considerations. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE and OpenAlex searches were supplemented with Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection through 15 October 2026. The four export sets yielded 3460 records; conservative DOI/title deduplication retained 2642 unique records, after independent adjudication of 21 discordant-identifier groups. In accordance with the authors’ eligibility decisions, 16 publications (12 original and four newly identified observational studies) were retained for a narrative synthesis. Results: Davidson et al. reported comparable five-year overall survival in 83 pregnancy-associated melanoma patients and 309 matched controls (97% versus 97%). Kostaki et al. described 70 pregnancy-associated melanomas within a 1270-woman European cohort, with a mean Breslow thickness of 1.16 mm and five-year recurrence-free survival of 95%. Grippaudo et al. reported multidisciplinary surgical management in 20 pregnant patients. Borgers et al. described 72 women with advanced melanoma across two partly overlapping pregnancy-related groups, illustrating high maternal and perinatal risks and variation in treatment timing. Conclusions: Pregnancy itself is not consistently associated with adverse melanoma prognosis after accounting for disease characteristics, whereas treatment safety in gestation remains insufficiently established. Stage-specific, multidisciplinary and autonomy-respecting decisions are required; the evidence remains heterogeneous and registry populations must not be counted twice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mastrangelo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: