Key result
Higher Distressed Communities Index scores are linked to greater prevalence of cardiovascular disease and cardiometabolic risk factors.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and death worldwide, and risk scores such as the pooled cohort equations often underpredict risk in individuals with low socioeconomic status.
Is the Distressed Communities Index score associated with the zip code-level prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and disease in the United States?
Cross-Sectional (n=26,058)
Is the Distressed Communities Index score associated with the zip code-level prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and disease in the United States?
Higher Distressed Communities Index scores, along with rurality and southern geographic region, are independently associated with greater zip code-level prevalence of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in the United States, suggesting DCI may serve as a practical surrogate for socioeconomic status in risk stratification.
Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and death worldwide. Risk scores such as the pooled cohort equations often underpredict risk in individuals with low socioeconomic status. Methods We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Population Level Analysis and Community Estimates data set to obtain zip code–level prevalence of hypertension, obesity, stroke, diabetes, and coronary artery disease. The Distressed Communities Index (DCI) collates community socioeconomic status and social determinants/drivers of health metrics into a numerical score. Linear regression adjusted for region and rurality assessed associations between DCI and CVD prevalence. Results We included 26 058 US zip codes (2016–2020). The median DCI was 50.9 (interquartile range, 25.4–75.9). Each 1‐unit increase in DCI was associated with increased prevalence of obesity (β=0.10 [95% CI, 0.09–0.10]), hypertension (β=0.08 [95% CI, 0.08–0.09]), diabetes (β=0.06 [95% CI, 0.06–0.06]), coronary artery disease (β=0.03 [95% CI, 0.03–0.03]), and stroke (β=0.02 [95% CI, 0.02–0.02]; all P <0.001). Rurality and region were independently associated with CVD and risk factor prevalence, with rural and southern zip codes having the highest prevalence. Conclusions DCI, geographic region, and rurality are independently associated with greater prevalence of CVD and its risk factors in the United States. The DCI is a practical, scalable surrogate for socioeconomic status and social determinants/drivers of health that may enhance CVD risk stratification on the basis of an area's economic resilience or disadvantage. Using DCI with the Preventing Cardiovascular Events score may capture economic and social challenges it omits, warranting further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meili et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk factors and disease (hypertension, obesity, stroke, diabetes, and coronary artery disease) (n=26,058). Distressed Communities Index (DCI) score (per 1-unit increase) was evaluated on Zip code-level prevalence of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and stroke (β 0.10 (obesity), β 0.08 (hypertension), β 0.06 (diabetes), β 0.03 (CAD), β 0.02 (stroke), 95% CI 0.09-0.10 (obesity), 0.08-0.09 (hypertension), 0.06-0.06 (diabetes), 0.03-0.03 (CAD), 0.02-0.02 (stroke), p=<0.001). Each 1-unit increase in the Distressed Communities Index was associated with higher prevalence of obesity (β=0.10), hypertension (β=0.08), diabetes (β=0.06), CAD (β=0.03), and stroke (β=0.02; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: