OBJECTIVES: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in acute leukaemia. This systematic review and meta-analyses sought to evaluate IFI epidemiology to inform infection prevention and surveillance practice. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science (2019-2024). Meta-analyses using random-effects models with a DerSimonian-Laird variance-estimator were performed to describe IFI event-rates, pathogen aetiology and antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) use in breakthrough cases. RESULTS: Meta-analyses of 17 publications (n=3291) yielded a pooled IFI event rate of 8.0% (95% CI 6.0%-11.0%), highest in acute myeloid leukaemia/myelodysplastic syndrome; 8.0% (95% CI 6.0%-10.0%). Across 16 studies (n=3071), Aspergillus spp. predominated (5.0% event rate, 95% CI 4.0%-7.0%). Data from 14 studies (n=2537) suggested a breakthrough-IFI rate of 7.0% (95% CI 5.0%-10.0%), mainly Aspergillus spp.; 62.0% (95% CI 50.0%-74.0%). Across 12 studies (n=2035), most breakthroughs occurred on mould-active-azole-prophylaxis; 39.0% (95% CI 18.0%-60.0%). Heterogeneity was moderate-high (I²=55.4%-91.3%). Reporting of infection prevention measures was limited. CONCLUSIONS: IFIs remain a major complication in acute leukaemia, with a substantial burden of Aspergillus. These findings support the optimisation of mould-active AFP for high-risk patients whilst highlighting the importance of prospective surveillance alongside standardised reporting and integration of adjunctive stewardship and control measures to strengthen IFI prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: