This study employed a comprehensive literature review to identify existing articles that address theoretical and conceptual frameworks. Articles were sourced from reputable academic databases such as Google Scholar, Academia.edu, ResearchGate, among others. This approach involves summarizing and synthesizing existing literature in a narrative format. The study provides a descriptive overview of key concepts, findings, and debates within the field. The research paper provides a broad overview of a topic or to explore emerging trends and debates. The implications of not using conceptual reviews and theoretical reviews in social sciences and management sciences research extend beyond individual research studies to impact the credibility, relevance, and ethical integrity of research findings, as well as the advancement of knowledge and professional development within the field. By prioritizing conceptual and theoretical grounding in their research processes, researchers can enhance the quality, impact, and relevance of their work, contributing to a deeper understanding of social and organizational phenomena and informing evidence-based decision-making and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alani Olusegun EFUNTADE (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: