IntroductionNanoparticle coatings on orthodontic brackets have antibacterial potential but may alter surface roughness and friction at the bracket-archwire interface.This study compared the surface roughness and static frictional resistance of stainless steel brackets coated with silver-impregnated copper oxide (CuO+Ag) or silver-impregnated titanium dioxide (TiO₂+Ag) nanoparticles with those of uncoated brackets. Materials and methodsThirty stainless steel maxillary central incisor brackets (0.022-inch slot) were allocated into three groups (n = 10 each): uncoated control, CuO+Ag-coated, and TiO₂+Ag-coated.Arithmetic average roughness (Ra), root mean square roughness (Rq), and maximum peak-to-valley height (Rz) were measured by atomic force microscopy as received (T0), after coating (T1), and after friction testing (T2).Static friction was measured using a universal testing machine with a 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel archwire in artificial saliva.Data were analyzed using one-way or Welch analysis of variance with post hoc tests and paired t-tests (p < 0.05). ResultsBaseline roughness was comparable among the groups.At T1, CuO+Ag increased Ra, Rq, and Rz, whereas TiO₂+Ag increased Ra and Rq but decreased Rz (paired t-test, |t(9)| ≥ 10.82, p < 0.001).Static friction differed among the groups (F(2, 27) = 9.15, p < 0.001, η² = 0.404).CuO+Ag showed the lowest friction (36.31 ± 3.90 gf), significantly lower than the control (41.65 ± 4.77 gf; q = 3.82, p = 0.031) and TiO₂+Ag (44.65 ± 4.53 gf; q = 5.97, p < 0.001), whereas TiO₂+Ag did not differ from the control (q = 2.15, p = 0.298).Roughness increased in all groups after friction testing (t(9) ≥ 33.48, p < 0.001), with smaller increases in the coated groups. ConclusionsBoth nanocoatings altered bracket surface roughness.CuO+Ag significantly reduced static frictional resistance and appears promising for further investigation as an orthodontic bracket coating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alekhya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: