= 52) groups. In the overall sample, the MIL demonstrated outstanding classification accuracy (a significant area under the curve = .96), with a cutoff score of ≤44 (96% sensitivity/91% specificity). Across diagnostic groups, the MIL maintained outstanding classification accuracy (area under the curve = .90-.97) with strong sensitivity and specificity. Convergent validity analyses indicated expected associations with other memory-based PVTs, while discriminant validity analyses yielded weak associations with executive function and memory domains. Supplemental analysis using a ≥1 PVT failure threshold yielded acceptable classification accuracy (area under the curve = .78), with a cutoff score of ≤44 (53% sensitivity/96% specificity). Findings indicate that the MIL is a psychometrically robust freestanding PVT. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leese et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: