Mining and ecological restoration frequently overlap in environmentally fragile regions, yet the spatial extent and temporal evolution of restoration-related carbon recovery remain poorly quantified. We developed an integrated indicator framework for the middle Yellow River Basin (MYRB) using multisource data from 2000 to 2025. The framework combined an a net primary productivity (NPP)-adjusted InVEST carbon model, Theil–Sen slope estimation, the Mann–Kendall trend test, Pettitt change-point detection, multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR), and an exponential asymptotic recovery model. The results showed that carbon sequestration service (CS) increased from 101.93 Mg·hm −2 in 2000 to 105.49 Mg·hm −2 in 2025, with a Theil–Sen slope of 0.15 Mg·hm −2 ·yr −1 , while total ecosystem carbon stock rose from approximately 3.27 to 3.33 Pg. A regional transition was detected around 2017, after which the rate of increase was higher. Natural predictors, particularly precipitation, evapotranspiration, and radiation, showed broad-scale associations with CS, whereas nighttime light, population density, and human activity intensity showed more localized associations. The combined coefficient-based contribution of anthropogenic factors increased from 47.07% to 50.29% after 2017. Mean CS within mining areas was 77.29 Mg·hm −2 , approximately 25.45% below the basin-wide multi-year mean CS density. CS increased nonlinearly with distance from mine boundaries. The proposed 95% recovery-distance indicator decreased from 2.58 to 8.49 km during 2000–2011 to 1.25–2.46 km during 2012–2025, indicating a shorter modeled distance to near-background conditions. This framework links long-term carbon dynamics, scale-dependent associations, and a recovery-distance indicator to support regional monitoring priorities and carbon-oriented land-use planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: