This study presents a multi-objective topology optimization framework for lightweight thermo-mechanical structures subjected to simultaneous mechanical, thermal, and dynamic requirements. A two-dimensional simply supported structure is modeled using a structured quadrilateral finite element mesh comprising 4,800 Q4 elements and 4,961 nodes. The material distribution is parameterized using the Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) approach with a penalization factor of 3.0 and a prescribed volume fraction of 40%. Three coupled performance criteria are considered: structural compliance, total heat transfer, and fundamental natural frequency. Thermal, structural, and modal finite element analyses are sequentially performed for each candidate topology within a multi-objective evolutionary optimization procedure. The optimized configuration preserves the prescribed material volume and total mass of 31.20 kg while redistributing material toward mechanically and dynamically efficient regions. The results show a reduction in structural compliance from 8.70646×10 − 2 to 8.65559×10 − 2 , corresponding to a 0.584% improvement. The fundamental natural frequency increases from 145.63 to 148.24 Hz, representing a 1.793% improvement, while the second and third natural frequencies reach 295.03 and 555.69 Hz, respectively. Total heat transfer changes only marginally from 43.2021 to 43.2368 W, corresponding to a 0.0804% increase. The final optimized structure exhibits a maximum displacement of 4.6663×10 − 4 m, maximum von Mises stress of 1.0372×10 5 Pa, mean von Mises stress of 1.3848×10 4 Pa, and maximum heat flux of 421.08 W/m². The results demonstrate that coupled topology optimization can improve structural stiffness and dynamic performance while maintaining a fixed material budget and nearly unchanged thermal behavior. The proposed framework provides a computationally efficient basis for the design of lightweight structures requiring simultaneous mechanical, thermal, and vibration performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmoud Fadhel Idan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: