AIMS: This first-in-human phase 1 trial evaluated the OX40 agonist antibody ABBV-368 as monotherapy and with the anti-programmed cell death protein (PD)-1 budigalimab in advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In dose escalation, patients with solid tumors received ABBV-368 monotherapy. In dose expansion, patients with relapsed/refractory triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) received ABBV-368 monotherapy, and patients with anti-PD-(ligand)1-naive or relapsed/refractory head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) received ABBV-368 and budigalimab combination. A novel biomarker detecting active OX40 guided dose optimization. Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics evaluation. Preliminary efficacy and biomarkers were examined. ABBV-368 exhibited dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, which were not altered by budigalimab coadministration. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 44% (escalation), 43% (TNBC), and 53% (HNSCC) of patients; immune-related AE rates were those expected for anti-PD-1 therapies; two patients had ABBV-368- and budigalimab-related serious AE of colitis. There were two complete and three partial confirmed responses. Biomarkers reflected CD8 T-cell activation and interferon-gamma (IFNγ)-induced activity. CONCLUSIONS: ABBV-368 with/without budigalimab was well tolerated and induced dose-specific immune cell activation in advanced solid tumors. Further combination or optimization strategies are required for meaningful clinical benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: