Mine planning involves high-stakes decisions under geological, economic, operational, and sustainability-related uncertainties. Conventional optimization frameworks rely on simplified block economic value (BEV) models that omit geomechanical variability, metallurgical responses, multi-element contributions, and environmental and social externalities. This paper introduces the Comprehensive Net Block Value (CNBV) framework, which extends conventional block economic valuation through a comprehensive representation of block value. CNBV extends the conventional BEV formulation through five value-modifying modules: (i) a Rock Cost Index (RCI) for cost scaling based on material properties; (ii) an Extra Substance Impact Coefficient (ESIC) capturing recovery penalties from undesirable material content; (iii) penalty functions for deleterious elements under different mining and processing pathways; (iv) generalized by-product and co-product contributions; and (v) monetized environmental and social costs. The framework is applied to the transition from open-pit to block caving by extending the model of Badakhshan et al. (2024) and demonstrated on a large-scale copper deposit. The CNBV model identifies an optimal transition at 725 m, with a 22-year mine life, extracting 510 Mt at 0.50% grade, a stripping ratio of 1.22, and an NPV of USD 6.80 billion. In contrast, the BEV model suggests a deeper transition at 887.5 m, a higher stripping ratio of 1.64, a lower grade of 0.46%, and a higher NPV of USD 7.51 billion. The 162.5 m difference demonstrates the influence of incorporating additional value-modifying factors into block valuation. Sensitivity analysis shows that cost scaling and multi-element contributions most influence NPV, while environmental and social costs gain importance under stricter regulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badakhshan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: