Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a residual-guided adaptive pressure basis for dimension-reduced FLIP liquid simulation. Uniform dimension reduction lowers the cost of the pressure Poisson solve, but aggressive coarsening can under-represent localized pressure variation near impacts, thin sheets, and complex free surfaces. Our method augments the coarse surface-aware pressure basis only in regions predicted to require additional representation capacity. The selection criterion combines the fine-grid residual of the reduced pressure solution with free-surface curvature and local velocity variation. To avoid a same-frame refinement re-solve, the filtered residual from the previous time step is used as a temporal predictor, while the geometric and kinematic indicators respond to newly formed structures. The resulting adaptive system requires a single reduced pressure solve per time step. Comparisons with uniform dimension reduction and full-resolution projection show lower pressure approximation error and post-projection divergence than uniform reduction with only a modest increase in pressure degrees of freedom and computation time. The same formulation is evaluated in both 2D and 3D FLIP simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jong-Hyun Kim (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: