Background/Objectives: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and molecularly heterogeneous breast cancer subtype for which early detection remains clinically important. Circulating non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs), are being investigated as blood-based biomarkers. This narrative review evaluates the clinical evidence for circulating ncRNAs as liquid-biopsy biomarkers for early TNBC detection, focusing on stage I–II disease, diagnostic performance, comparator selection, and validation. Methods: Peer-reviewed studies published between 2009 and October 2026 were identified primarily through PubMed/MEDLINE searches, supplemented by Google Scholar searches, with particular attention to disease stage, comparator populations, diagnostic performance, and validation status. Results: Among the ncRNA classes reviewed, circulating miRNAs provide the most directly relevant, although still limited, clinical evidence for early-stage TNBC detection, whereas evidence for lncRNAs and circRNAs remains predominantly exploratory and insufficiently validated for early-stage detection. Translation is limited by small, heterogeneous cohorts, analytical variability, and insufficient independent and prospective validation. Conclusions: High diagnostic accuracy in selected cohorts does not establish clinical readiness. Standardized analytical workflows, independent multicenter validation, prospective evaluation in intended-use populations, and integration with imaging and clinical assessment are needed before circulating ncRNA signatures can be considered for clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuleva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: