Epilepsy associated with brain tumors occupies a special place among structural focal epilepsies; it requires a multidisciplinary approach to treatment and close collaboration between a neurologist-epileptologist, a neurosurgeon and an oncologist. Frequent and severe epileptic seizures (including status epilepticus), drug-resistant disease and high mortality rates determine the severity of the condition and the poor quality of life experienced by patients. With the emergence of new and cutting-edge anti-seizure medications (ASMs), it is now a priority to identify the most effective and safest ASMs for the treatment of this patient group. Objective: a retrospective comparative analysis of the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel (PER) as an adjunctive therapy for tumor-associated epilepsies, compared with conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Material and methods. The study included data from 156 adult patients (aged 19–83) with primary and secondary brain tumors and tumor-associated epilepsy. The patients were divided into two comparable groups of 78 patients each: the main group received antiepileptic therapy including PER, whilst the comparison group received combinations of other AEDs. The follow-up period ranged from 1 year to 3 years or more. Efficacy was assessed after 12 months of treatment in both groups. Results. In the main group, 59% of patients achieved either a one-year seizure remission or a reduction in their frequency of more than 50%, which was significantly higher than the corresponding figure in the comparison group (41%; p=0.014). The incidence of adverse events in the PER group was half that in the control group (10% versus 20%); these events were dose-dependent and did not require discontinuation of the drug. Conclusion. PER has demonstrated high efficacy and a favourable safety profile in tumor-associated epilepsy, which justifies its use in clinical practice for this patient group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhulin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: