Insufficient protein and dietary fiber intake in Indonesia calls for practical, nutrient-dense foods. This study evaluated an instant powdered drink combining tempeh puree and defatted coconut flour (DCF), produced by foam mat drying, in four formulations (tempeh puree:DCF, g): F1 (40:8), F2 (45:6), F3 (50:4), and F4 (55:2), with two batches each. Formulation significantly affected (p < 0.05) rehydration time (86.15–89.32 s), dietary fiber (3.86–7.29%), fat, and the acceptance of aroma, taste, and aftertaste (4.66–6.04; n = 50), but not moisture, solubility, hygroscopicity, protein, or color acceptance. Higher DCF levels increased fiber but reduced acceptability, whereas higher tempeh puree levels improved acceptability without changing protein, revealing a trade-off between nutritional quality and sensory acceptability. F2 offered the best balance, with protein (13.25 g/100 g) and fiber (6.00 g/100 g) nominally meeting the “source of protein” and “high in fiber” claim thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Safina et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: