Background and objectives: Rational use of antidiabetic medicines is important in patients with diabetes, particularly when comorbidities increase treatment complexity. This study assessed antidiabetic drug utilization and prescribing patterns and evaluated whether a patient information leaflet (PIL) improved knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) related to diabetes and its complications. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted among 155 adults with diabetes and comorbidities admitted to a tertiary care hospital over six months. We obtained demographic and prescription data from case records and treatment charts. Antidiabetic utilisation was examined using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/Defined Daily Dose (ATC/DDD) approach, and prescribing patterns were assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) core prescribing indicators. A PIL on diabetes and its complications was developed, translated into Kannada, validated, and assessed for readability. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 28; paired t-test and Pearson correlation were used, with P<0.001 considered statistically significant. Results: Among the 155 participants, 86 (55.4%) were men and 69 (44.5%) were women; 47 (30.3%) were aged 61–70 years. Hypertension was the most frequently reported comorbidity (100/155, 64.5%). Oral hypoglycaemic agents accounted for 126/223 (56.5%) antidiabetic drugs, and insulin for 97/223 (43.4%). Dapagliflozin and regular insulin were the most frequently recorded agents within their respective groups. Brand-name prescribing accounted for 154/170 (90.5%) drugs, while generic prescribing accounted for 16/170 (9.4%). The reported WHO indicators included a mean of 15 medicines per encounter, generic prescribing in 8.08%, antibiotic use in 83.22% of encounters, injection use in 98.06%, and prescribing from the essential medicines list in 50.38%. Among 155 prescriptions assessed for DDD pattern, 118 (76.12%) had a DDD ratio <1, 20 (12.9%) had a ratio of 1, and 17 (10.96%) had a ratio >1. Mean KAP scores increased from 2.57 to 4.66 for knowledge, 2.96 to 4.69 for attitude, and 2.96 to 4.62 for practice after the PIL intervention (P<0.001 for each). Interpretation and conclusions: The study identified substantial variation from the prescribing patterns expected by WHO core indicators, alongside extensive brand-name prescribing and frequent use of antibiotics and injections. The PIL was associated with marked short-term improvement in diabetes-related KAP scores and was well accepted by participants. Larger, multicentre studies with longer follow-up and clinical outcomes are needed to determine whether these improvements are sustained and translate into better diabetes control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathew et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: