Canine hip osteoarthritis (OA) requires multidimensional assessment. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated 4-week treatment with meloxicam, PCSO-524, EAB-277, meloxicam plus PCSO-524, or placebo in 203 client-owned dogs with naturally occurring hip OA. The principal outcome was index-hindlimb peak vertical force (PVF) measured by force-plate gait analysis. Secondary outcomes included PVF responder status, orthopedic assessment score (OAS), Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs (LOAD), Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI), and safety assessments. The primary baseline-adjusted mean PVF analysis did not demonstrate treatment superiority among groups. A secondary responder analysis using an analysis-stage >5%BW PVF threshold showed that meloxicam had a nominally higher Week 4 responder probability than placebo (relative risk = 4.000; 95% confidence interval, 1.223 to 13.079; p = 0.022), interpreted as supportive rather than confirmatory. Within-group score reductions were observed in LOAD and CBPI pain interference for the combination group, LOAD for PCSO-524, and CBPI pain interference for EAB-277. OAS did not change significantly within any group. Between-group differences in LOAD and CBPI changes were not significant. No consistent group-level laboratory safety concern was detected. These findings support multidimensional assessment while emphasizing that secondary results do not establish treatment superiority.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kashemsant et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: