Lesion responses to chemoradiotherapy can differ within a patient, complicating prognostic assessment in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We developed AMMR-Surv to integrate prototype-based metabolic response learning, asymmetric CT comparison, and event-aware multi-lesion aggregation. This retrospective study included 126 patients from ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 with paired fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) before and after treatment. Overall survival was measured from post-treatment examination. Five-fold nested patient-level cross-validation was repeated five times, with prototype counts selected within each outer training partition. Aggregated out-of-fold Uno’s concordance was 0.719 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.670–0.772), with a 24-month area under the curve of 0.765 and an integrated Brier score of 0.1747. Paired concordance differences were 0.007 (95% CI, −0.021 to 0.046) versus generic longitudinal modeling and 0.059 (95% CI, 0.005–0.114) versus clinical variables with simple PET measurements. Across three runs on 120 common lesion sites, aligned prototype-assignment agreement ranged from 93.33% to 96.67%. These results support further evaluation of lesion-response representations, although superiority over generic longitudinal modeling remains uncertain. The small, selected cohort limits generalizability, and earlier fixed-four-prototype analyses remain exploratory because that configuration was selected using test performance. Independent validation is required before clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: