This paper presents aesthetic transformation as a methodology for peace education and conflict transformation. Drawing on qualitative analysis of interviews with peace educators and facilitators, it shows how music- and movement-based practices can function as structured action–reflection processes rather than expressive supplements. Facilitators can intentionally create an ethical container that enables participants to engage with conflict and discomfort without re-traumatisation. This container rests on three principles: consent, understood as the continuing right to agree, refuse, or withdraw; care, as attentiveness to physical, emotional, and relational needs; and confidentiality, as the protection of personal stories and embodied experiences. Within this framework, embodied practices cultivate an ‘inner comfort zone’—a somatically grounded capacity to remain present with difficulty while maintaining agency and self-regulation. This supports an indirect, ethically attuned approach to the ‘wounded place’, understood as the embodied intersection of personal and collective pain. By translating lived experience into shared artistic forms and social metaphors, aesthetic transformation enables groups to move beyond habitual conflict patterns and co-create possibilities for dialogue, understanding, and social change. The paper positions aesthetic transformation as a culturally adaptable and ethically grounded practice for peace education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marek Zink (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: