Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using FDIC data on the 4,212 active insured institutions with positive assets (mostly reporting for 30 June 2026), I describe the size distribution of US banks. Total assets are 26,452.7 billion dollars; the largest bank holds 15.47%, the top four 40.19% and the top ten 54.21%, while the median bank has 0.388 billion dollars. The Herfindahl-Hirschman index of assets is 501.9, equivalent to 19.9 banks of equal size. I prove and verify the identity HHI = 1/n + n Var(s), which separates the effect of the number of banks from the inequality of their shares. The upper tail is close to Pareto with an exponent below one: the Hill estimator gives 0.736 to 0.792 across tail sizes of 50 to 1,000 banks, and the Gabaix-Ibragimov rank-minus-one-half regression gives 0.762 to 0.876. An exponent below one implies that the largest bank holds a non-vanishing share of total assets however many banks there are. The number of insured institutions fell from a peak of 14,496 in 1984 to 4,327 in 2025, a fall of 70.2%. Under the identity, consolidation raises measured concentration through both terms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manoj Kumar Aguru (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: